Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Mon Oct 22, 2012 8:15 pm
Oh darn, she's not gonna send me pictures or fuck me? What a shame, my intent was to ask after confirming she was a girl :(
Page 2 of 3
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 12:06 am
Haaang on, i'm not against looking for more evidence - but a .derp is pretty much a dead-on at a client which nearly always comes with xray as well as flying/autotargeting/autoswitch/falldamagenegation/egghacking. We have no rules about having the client installed, but the moment one uses it one should be thrown into shackles and ridiculed. .derp is just an afk forcefield.
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 1:51 am
When you get stupid replies everytime you answer a question its hard not to hate that question and suspect a stupid reply.TLRedemption wrote:Can't a man ask a question without getting so much flak?
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 5:22 am
Figured as much, perhaps you should consider the person before thinking that he's going to discriminate your gender.KaiCrafty wrote:When you get stupid replies everytime you answer a question its hard not to hate that question and suspect a stupid reply.TLRedemption wrote:Can't a man ask a question without getting so much flak?
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Tue Oct 23, 2012 3:20 pm
Agreed, but I don't think moving one's head in a strange manner is worthy of a ban. If this was a full on .derp, I definitely would ban.Box wrote:Haaang on, i'm not against looking for more evidence - but a .derp is pretty much a dead-on at a client which nearly always comes with xray as well as flying/autotargeting/autoswitch/falldamagenegation/egghacking. We have no rules about having the client installed, but the moment one uses it one should be thrown into shackles and ridiculed. .derp is just an afk forcefield.
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 8:12 pm
RevStoningpot wrote:Fuck off i will never conform to being another internet retard. So keep your dumbass rules and misspellings. And all your shitty ass jokes which for some reason you all call memes when in actuality they are cliches. A meme is a cultural norm, not an over used joke. As in; it is an internet meme to post bad internet cliches every where. Damn I'm glad I know intelligent people in real life, I'd blow my brains out if i had to seek intellectual conversation among the people of the internet. If she wants to be a girl she's a fucking girl, WTF does it matter? I'm sure she's not going to fuck you or send you naked pictures.
Also rule 63.
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 8:48 pm
I know that that rule makes no sense. Is it supposed to mean only video game characters? Cuz it just says character which could mean any member of an internet show/comic what ever and they don't have arbitrary female versions for every character. Also what about a female character? Is there an alternate male model for every female or can extra female characters be on the internet with out one?
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Wed Oct 24, 2012 9:08 pm
And rule 63.1RevStoningpot wrote:I know that that rule makes no sense. Is it supposed to mean only video game characters? Cuz it just says character which could mean any member of an internet show/comic what ever and they don't have arbitrary female versions for every character. Also what about a female character? Is there an alternate male model for every female or can extra female characters be on the internet with out one?
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 6:43 am
403 there is no such thing as 63.1
Re: Movement hack - kylebritt
Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 1:53 pm
Says you, it's the inverse of 63.RevStoningpot wrote:403 there is no such thing as 63.1