Page 11 of 45
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:55 am
by mitte90
if u and all others are ok with just taking down the limit its fine by me.. BUT i dont think it gona work.. and please write down ur point in a smaller form i have read ur long post and most are gibberish and i cant be bothered to read it.
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:57 am
by YoungsMC
I have a Tl;Dr version of it but there it says that if you voted "Yes" for multiworld you should read the entire post.
I think all of the "No" voters would rather have no limit at all than this.
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:58 am
by mitte90
yourcreepyuncle wrote:Guys, Yes this is a fast solution to removing the limit, but DO NOT get blinded by that. This is an important decision that is going to determine whether or not this server is going to stick by its values and stay vanilla, or turn into what we said we were not going to be.
THIS SERVER ARE ALREADY UNVANILLA AND THIS DO NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE BASIC IDEA. if u dont agree with that come with reasons for that. im trying to save this server i believe the limit are killing it
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:00 am
by YoungsMC
Even if this server is Unvanilla this counters with the basic idea. Mitte, every argument you've made has been covered & elaborated in my big post. In the long run reading it will save us all time.
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:01 am
by yourcreepyuncle
I KNOW MITTE I'M SAYING THAT WE SHOULD REMOVE THE LIMIT BUT WE KNOW THATS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AND THATS WHY I LIKE YOUNGS PLAN. ok :D
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:01 am
by mitte90
i have read it, it is gibberish please make ur points in a smaller format that way its easier for everyone.
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:03 am
by mitte90
the only argument i have heard from u are thats its no difference from what we have now...
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:03 am
by LoneSoldier55
Mitte, is this what you're looking for?
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:05 am
by YoungsMC
>Worldruler086 makes a big post
mitte90 wrote:worldruler i almost skipped ur post for being to long but i did read it and im glad i did. ur post describe very well what i feel and fear. thanks
>I make a big post
mitte90 wrote:i have read it, it is gibberish please make ur points in a smaller format that way its easier for everyone.
Lone, this is supposed to be a mature debate <3
Good picture though.
Re: Multiworld
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:07 am
by YoungsMC
mitte90 wrote:the only argument i have heard from u are thats its no difference from what we have now...
Argument 1: Multiworld doesn't fit with what SimplicityPvP is supposed to be
Argument 2: This is completely useless
Argument 3: This creates less PvP be splitting the playerbase between two worlds