Page 16 of 45

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:04 pm
by Boxy
This is why democracy is a fail system. People don't even understand what they're voting on...
Yes, this small factor heavily outweighs the cons of dictatorship.

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:06 pm
by worldruler086
Boxy wrote:
This is why democracy is a fail system. People don't even understand what they're voting on...
Yes, this small factor heavily outweighs the cons of dictatorship.
To be fair, the pros of democracy far outweigh the pros of dictatorship as well.

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:17 pm
by Boxy
to quote a forum philosopher of ours, .. thatsthejoke.jpg

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:38 pm
by Gnatogryz
I guess people are voting no, because they think this somehow introduces teleportation or splits the server in half, or even creates "Safe worlds". That's why Rev was right - the votes should be public. Hell - every person should explain why they're voting on something - just to make sure they've actually read the first post.

Btw China isn't doing so bad, even though they don't have democracy ;)

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 8:44 pm
by worldruler086
Even though I already said why I voted, I'll say it again, just to make it clear. I'm voting for this for 3 main reasons. Ending the limit is not one of them. (though it is one of the lesser ones)
1. A compromise both parties (not everyone, but both parties) can agree upon.
2. A pvp event world that would be easily accessable, which will make the game easier for players, and will also be easier on the newer people (the non-spawn rats), so this will INCREASE the number of people who join and stay. Much more then any limit would.
3. This seems like something I could do, and I don't like pvp. I could see myself fighting in arenas for fun, so why is this bad? It seems almost like the olympics, people from far away lands being able to go to one place at one time, without the travel.

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 9:34 pm
by LoneSoldier55
Image

Are you fucking kidding me Youngs. Now all you seem to be doing is going against what everyone wants.

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:20 pm
by Bloop the poop
I guess since there's no helping it... i'll go with this multiworld shit. Give it a try... ;)

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:22 pm
by worldruler086
bloop, why are you against this? It seems that those against this misinterpret what is being voted on.

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 10:53 pm
by FoSchnizzle
Didn't he just say he's for it now...?

Re: Multiworld

Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2012 11:02 pm
by worldruler086
reluctantly. I'm wondering why he was against it in the first place.