Page 3 of 3

Re: Movement hack - kylebritt

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 5:42 pm
by RevStoningpot
not says me says rule 403. You want to argue against your own laws? Personally I don't see any sort of ratification of these laws so there for none of them are valid. Also the inverse of 63 would be 36

Re: Movement hack - kylebritt

Posted: Thu Oct 25, 2012 11:59 pm
by LoneSoldier55
Image

Re: Movement hack - kylebritt

Posted: Fri Oct 26, 2012 12:16 am
by RevStoningpot
You? Give a fuck? I wouldn't dream