Page 5 of 5

Re: Simpvp fourms confirmed for dead

Posted: Wed Sep 26, 2012 6:08 pm
by oldolwa
oh nostalgia...

Re: Simpvp fourms confirmed for dead

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:20 am
by Box
TLRedemption wrote:
Box wrote:Fix and the monolith users came when I was still digging out Eden. Loooooooooooooong time coming.
I remember you the first time i joined box, you were having a really fucked up discussion, i can't exactly remember the topic, i also remember qwuke quite well among others, and wrl_avo
Thing is, I have an amazing memory. You remember the Late-abortion-makeshift-blood bag discussion, when were talking about my idea of using lower class women for an actually needed use as blood production wombs suspended in respiratory cells. It went on for a few days, with lots of naysaying and rude accusations - but I got my idea out there. And that is what really counts for the evolution of humanity.

Re: Simpvp fourms confirmed for dead

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 2:26 am
by oldolwa
Damn Box. Im impressed.

Re: Simpvp fourms confirmed for dead

Posted: Thu Oct 18, 2012 5:50 pm
by RevStoningpot
are you saying- using a woman's womb to produce red blood cells for blood transfer?

Re: Simpvp fourms confirmed for dead

Posted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 12:27 am
by TLRedemption
Box wrote:
TLRedemption wrote:
Box wrote:Fix and the monolith users came when I was still digging out Eden. Loooooooooooooong time coming.
I remember you the first time i joined box, you were having a really fucked up discussion, i can't exactly remember the topic, i also remember qwuke quite well among others, and wrl_avo
Thing is, I have an amazing memory. You remember the Late-abortion-makeshift-blood bag discussion, when were talking about my idea of using lower class women for an actually needed use as blood production wombs suspended in respiratory cells. It went on for a few days, with lots of naysaying and rude accusations - but I got my idea out there. And that is what really counts for the evolution of humanity.
Yes, that was precisely it, when I was building my base with plankerman, you were in the chat talking about fetuses, and I was thinking you were just the server troll trying to stir people up haha.

Re: Simpvp fourms confirmed for dead

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 8:42 pm
by Box
RevStoningpot wrote:are you saying- using a woman's womb to produce red blood cells for blood transfer?
Correct, our current definition of living gives us the right to do whatever we wish to a gestating fetus with the carriers consent, that is in the non-religious europe. Even in the far-right US it's not a federal crime to conduct fetus research.
Their rapid rate of growth is excellent for a "living" blood bag that is easily discarded, and we can force the object into rapid growth by administrating steroids while sacrificing motor functions, which happens to extreme bodybuilders during pregnancy - the offspring often showing signs of downs syndrome.
We do not care for health of biological blood bags, so this is only to our benefit.

It is a way of controlling population growth, as well as giving an use for females not deemed able to care for or produce offspring with a good enough pool of genes.

Re: Simpvp fourms confirmed for dead

Posted: Sat Oct 20, 2012 10:33 pm
by LoneSoldier55
Box wrote:
RevStoningpot wrote:are you saying- using a woman's womb to produce red blood cells for blood transfer?
Correct, our current definition of living gives us the right to do whatever we wish to a gestating fetus with the carriers consent, that is in the non-religious europe. Even in the far-right US it's not a federal crime to conduct fetus research.
Their rapid rate of growth is excellent for a "living" blood bag that is easily discarded, and we can force the object into rapid growth by administrating steroids while sacrificing motor functions, which happens to extreme bodybuilders during pregnancy - the offspring often showing signs of downs syndrome.
We do not care for health of biological blood bags, so this is only to our benefit.

It is a way of controlling population growth, as well as giving an use for females not deemed able to care for or produce offspring with a good enough pool of genes.
Image