Page 6 of 6
Re: Portals: A replacement for the pvp world
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 12:20 am
by A. Pippenger
Not a single diamond, I just meant a cost in diamonds. It was a pretty ambiguous sentence, sorry about that.
I think we actually agree on every point up for discussion here. We can have a flamewar if you feel like it though.
Re: Portals: A replacement for the pvp world
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 7:53 am
by Yukar9
I must say, I'm quite surprised at how this has turned. My worry when introducing this was that people would see it as making the server too difficult and dangerous, and yet now the argument is whether it's making the server too easy.
Re: Portals: A replacement for the pvp world
Posted: Sun Apr 26, 2015 11:16 am
by A. Pippenger
Yukar9 wrote:I must say, I'm quite surprised at how this has turned. My worry when introducing this was that people would see it as making the server too difficult and dangerous, and yet now the argument is whether it's making the server too easy.
It depends on if you're serious about removing /world or not, really.
Re: Portals: A replacement for the pvp world
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 7:29 am
by morl0ck
It doesn't really affect me, since there will be zero portals built anywhere near the Castle.
Re: Portals: A replacement for the pvp world
Posted: Sat May 02, 2015 12:32 pm
by MtlGuy
So if diamonds are paid relative to the distance the portal transports you, will they work like nether portals? That is, will the player simply build one and then pay a certain amount of diamonds to activate the portal and upon stepping through a second portal will be created as the 'exit' ?