FoSchnizzleTheSecond wrote:Mr_Hole_Digger1 wrote:FoSchnizzleTheSecond wrote:No matter what it is, surely you don't have to post so many times. Also, by calling your opinion "wisdom" and another's opinion "stupid crap" you've lost even more respect.
I'm trying to answer your comments, if I leave them, then what good will that do? It's not my wisdom, it's Gods wisdom, not mine, Gods. So what is the stuff lone posts called then Fo? Got a better, more correct name for it? Your terminology for that is Sh*tposting, lol.
I didn't lose any respect, you never respected me in the first place, are you kidding me?
There's this thing, I know you're familiar with it. It's called disrespect, which is the same as a loss of respect. Either way, you don't have to leave them, you can simply put more than one sentence into the same post. Also, it is only your opinion that this God even exists, let alone that his "wisdom" holds true. I'm sure Lone views his words as "wisdom" of his own, and he may very well believe in himself as a godly figure, which makes your arguments equal in stupidity. Please treat them as such.
Ever considered applying his wisdom to your life?
Adding this to it: HUMAN OPINION OR GOD'S WORD?
From this point on, it is no longer their opinion against your opinion. It is now their opinion against God's final word on the matter. At this juncture they will usually say something to the effect that it is just your opinion that the Bible is God's Word. Then you reply: 'Since you reject God's authority on this matter, tell me on what basis should People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals decide what is right and wrong?'
'Why was it wrong for Hitler to do what he did? If God made no absolutes, Hitler or anyone else would have the right to set his own rules and his own agenda. He got most of Germany agreeing with his ethics, which he sincerely believed were good and right. Because of this, many people perished. Are you willing to say that he was right? If you think he was wrong, on what basis are you deciding that it is wrong? Why then should people believe your opinions concerning beliefs?'
Without too many words, you have pointed out the hypocrisy of his 'wannabe absolutist — but can't admit it' position, and the shifting-sand foundation of his ethics.
At this point, most people have to stop and think about the contradiction that exists in their assumptions. This is a step in the right direction. The next step is to introduce them to the foundation that Genesis provides. Hopefully, they will then begin to understand that they have transgressed God's absolutes and are in need of a Saviour.
