I understand that there is a zero tolerance policy for hacking.
But why is it referred to as the "appeal" area rather than dispute? Appealing a ban means nothing if there is a no second chance policy. Disputing would be like arguing against a wrongful ban.
The Appealing System
- RevStoningpot
- Moron
- Posts: 2477
- Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:39 pm
- Location: first star to the right and straight on till morning
- Contact:
Re: The Appealing System
I think the idea is that if someone is unbanned it's not necessaily because they didn't hack but because the evidence was not strong enough so it is a kind of second chance but if some one is clearly caught there are no second chances for "i didn't know the rules" or "I accidently hit fly" I don't know if that realy changes your point about word use. just thought i'd clear up second chances
Re: The Appealing System
Code: Select all
To apply for the removal of a cause from an inferior to a superior judge or court for the purpose of reexamination of for decision.
As far as I know, the word appeal is used properly here.