Multiworld

Post various suggestions here, if support is shown for your suggestion a vote will be started
Locked

[OFFICIAL MAJORITY VOTE] Do this? (majority at end of vote get their way)

Poll ended at Thu Mar 15, 2012 1:27 pm

Yes
23
62%
No
14
38%
 
Total votes: 37

FoSchnizzle
Moron
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:15 am
Contact:

Re: Multiworld

Post by FoSchnizzle »

IF they have reason. Smarten up.
joseph3114
still building aboveground
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: Multiworld

Post by joseph3114 »

Assuming your reasons supersede others.
Basically nether pvp failed so you want to make another world of smaller size to try again.
User avatar
RevStoningpot
Moron
Posts: 2477
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:39 pm
Location: first star to the right and straight on till morning
Contact:

Re: Multiworld

Post by RevStoningpot »

Wow you played in 1.8 what a regular. So as i understand it the only objection you have is command portal instead of physical portal. This is an aspect that could be voted for change once it's implimented. if you have no reason for the actual existance of a pvp world don't vote against it. Now as i've already stated i would contribute topvp in this world where as currently, due to the limit, i am unable to pvp at all. The only argument that limit supporters have ever had was to increase pvp. This idea would increase pvp way more than alienating half the server ever could. How could you deny that? Would no one else pvp more with this in place?
joseph3114
still building aboveground
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: Multiworld

Post by joseph3114 »

Those details need to be specified BEFORE a vote then.
Otherwise when people don't like it, or have a problem with it, you end up with "this isn't what I voted for..." and that will be the same nightmare this thread is.
FoSchnizzle
Moron
Posts: 1557
Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:15 am
Contact:

Re: Multiworld

Post by FoSchnizzle »

Nether pvp? Nether pvp was never a choice. You can't really have pvp in the nether well. It is still an infinite world, so less random encounters, it has shitloads of ghasts, fucking your day up, and zombie pigmen. Yay. The nether also requires a portal, as well as the same walking, albeit less, to fight. Also, the nether has screwed up terrain for fighting: it can have multiple layers, and the huge walls stretching to the floor and ceiling of the world. And the nether now has the glitch of spawning you on the ceiling. Have fun with that. In a world with a 1k limit, there is one ground, especially if we make it a flatland world, and your portal can't be destroyed, stranding you in the world. Also, the world isn't going to be infinite, and the world will only be for pvp, not travel, or farming warts, or such things. Smarten up. Regarding the whole it not being what you voted for, it can be changed, and/or argued. Once made certain, it will not be put in for a short while if it passes, giving time to argue specifics. Without voting for it, it won't be put in. Period.
joseph3114
still building aboveground
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: Multiworld

Post by joseph3114 »

We will let this vote decide that then.
User avatar
RevStoningpot
Moron
Posts: 2477
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 12:39 pm
Location: first star to the right and straight on till morning
Contact:

Re: Multiworld

Post by RevStoningpot »

joseph3114 wrote:Those details need to be specified BEFORE a vote then.,.
They were and it was 10 to 0 in favor of this design. Maybe if you noobs actualy cared about this server you would have given your opinion in that matter BEFORE the official vote
mitte90
OP
Posts: 1200
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2011 4:27 pm

Re: Multiworld

Post by mitte90 »

some question joseph, is joseph3114 ur minecraft name? when was the last time u was active on the server(playing occasionally dont count)? how did u hear about this poll?
User avatar
Gnatogryz
hated the previously assigned rank
Posts: 606
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:36 pm
Location: Poland

Re: Multiworld

Post by Gnatogryz »

So people who actually play on the server on a regular basis are about to lose to people who are just voting no because there is a "no" option available? This is bullshit. There have been no sensible arguments against.
Teleportation? Nope, multiworld ain't teleportation. Split? Nope, it ain't splitting since the pvp world is no place to have a base in. Complexity? Nope, this brings absolutely no change to the vanilla gamestyle, apart from removing a non-vanilla limit.
joseph3114
still building aboveground
Posts: 76
Joined: Sun Mar 11, 2012 10:42 pm

Re: Multiworld

Post by joseph3114 »

Coming up with reasons to discredit and exclude opposing viewpoints is really getting old.
Also, why is there a vote if everyone whose vote matters already has voted yes?

My minecraft name is joseph3114.
Last edited by joseph3114 on Mon Mar 12, 2012 12:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
Locked