My ban appeal

[Unic0rnb0i]

Idk if i have the right to talk on this subject but i agree with rev

[RevStoningpot]

well if there were many odd diamond digs that's all good

[mitte90]

the "trap" thing was not enough evidence to ban him because the devanish. and both gnat and box know this. it was the mining that banned him.

[Gnatogryz]

the "trap" thing was not enough evidence to ban him because the devanish. and both gnat and box know this.

that was a huge fail on our part, we will be much, much more careful in the future.

[LoneSoldier55]

Idk if i have the right to talk on this subject but i agree with rev

All users have a right to putting in a two cents on an appeal.

[Box]

the "trap" thing was not enough evidence to ban him because the devanish. and both gnat and box know this.

that was a huge fail on our part, we will be much, much more careful in the future.

Hunters lust.

[Gnatogryz]

Idk if i have the right to talk on this subject but i agree with rev

Yes, as I said before - the only rule is "no hacking". You can argue with the OPs and players alike as much as you want.

[Bloop the poop]

Bad gnat. Bad mitte. >:(

[RevStoningpot]

Bad gnat. Bad mitte. >:(

>:( WTF. I'm guessing the ">" is meant to look like angry eyebrows? But when ever i see this , I just read it as, "look at this frowny face >"