simplicitypvp.net

Idk if i have the right to talk on this subject but i agree with rev

well if there were many odd diamond digs that's all good

the "trap" thing was not enough evidence to ban him because the devanish. and both gnat and box know this. it was the mining that banned him.

mitte90 wrote:the "trap" thing was not enough evidence to ban him because the devanish. and both gnat and box know this.

that was a huge fail on our part, we will be much, much more careful in the future.

Unic0rnb0i wrote:Idk if i have the right to talk on this subject but i agree with rev

All users have a right to putting in a two cents on an appeal.

Gnatogryz wrote:

mitte90 wrote:the "trap" thing was not enough evidence to ban him because the devanish. and both gnat and box know this.

that was a huge fail on our part, we will be much, much more careful in the future.

Hunters lust.

Unic0rnb0i wrote:Idk if i have the right to talk on this subject but i agree with rev

Yes, as I said before - the only rule is "no hacking". You can argue with the OPs and players alike as much as you want.

Bad gnat. Bad mitte. >:(

Bloop the poop wrote:Bad gnat. Bad mitte. >:(

>:( WTF. I'm guessing the ">" is meant to look like angry eyebrows? But when ever i see this , I just read it as, "look at this frowny face >"