Multiworld

Post by **mitte90** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:55 am

if u and all others are ok with just taking down the limit its fine by me.. BUT i dont think it gona work.. and please write down ur point in a smaller form i have read ur long post and most are gibberish and i cant be bothered to read it.

YoungsMC · Post by **YoungsMC** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:57 am

I have a Tl;Dr version of it but there it says that if you voted "Yes" for multiworld you should read the entire post.
I think all of the "No" voters would rather have no limit at all than this.

Post by **mitte90** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 1:58 am

yourcreepyuncle wrote:Guys, Yes this is a fast solution to removing the limit, but DO NOT get blinded by that. This is an important decision that is going to determine whether or not this server is going to stick by its values and stay vanilla, or turn into what we said we were not going to be.

THIS SERVER ARE ALREADY UNVANILLA AND THIS DO NOT IN CONFLICT WITH THE BASIC IDEA. if u dont agree with that come with reasons for that. im trying to save this server i believe the limit are killing it

YoungsMC · Post by **YoungsMC** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:00 am

Even if this server is Unvanilla this counters with the basic idea. Mitte, every argument you've made has been covered & elaborated in my big post. In the long run reading it will save us all time.

yourcreepyuncle · Post by **yourcreepyuncle** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:01 am

I KNOW MITTE I'M SAYING THAT WE SHOULD REMOVE THE LIMIT BUT WE KNOW THATS NOT GOING TO HAPPEN AND THATS WHY I LIKE YOUNGS PLAN. ok :D

Post by **mitte90** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:01 am

i have read it, it is gibberish please make ur points in a smaller format that way its easier for everyone.

Post by **mitte90** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:03 am

the only argument i have heard from u are thats its no difference from what we have now...

LoneSoldier55 · Post by **LoneSoldier55** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:03 am

Mitte, is this what you're looking for?

YoungsMC · Post by **YoungsMC** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:05 am

>Worldruler086 makes a big post

mitte90 wrote:worldruler i almost skipped ur post for being to long but i did read it and im glad i did. ur post describe very well what i feel and fear. thanks

>I make a big post

mitte90 wrote:i have read it, it is gibberish please make ur points in a smaller format that way its easier for everyone.

Lone, this is supposed to be a mature debate <3
Good picture though.

YoungsMC · Post by **YoungsMC** » Sat Mar 10, 2012 2:07 am

mitte90 wrote:the only argument i have heard from u are thats its no difference from what we have now...

Argument 1: Multiworld doesn't fit with what SimplicityPvP is supposed to be
Argument 2: This is completely useless
Argument 3: This creates less PvP be splitting the playerbase between two worlds

simplicitypvp.net

Multiworld

[OFFICIAL MAJORITY VOTE] Do this? (majority at end of vote get their way)

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld

Re: Multiworld