mitte90 wrote:#1 as i told u its a difference to us combat this statement or leave it alone. i said its hard to debate.. its a quation about ideology.. i think the limit are a bigger problem to the servers ideology but the pro limit think its acceptable same thing in this matter.
#2 ok true but without it we must have the limit and the limit are in a way already voted down (its not finished yet doh) we are not going to come around this. we need a fast way to come together atleast it wont let u tp in the main world.
#3 i still thinks it valid. u dont have to use it.. i will probably not use it EVER but i will survive as good as now when i never go to spawn. but do u WANT to pvp u probably have to use the pvp-world but u are not forced
#1 It creates more problems than problems that it solves, if you'd actually think that it'll significantly increase PvP
#2 As I said this isn't a compromise. If you want to protect the minority, then cut this suggestion out or make a compromise for it. There's no hurry, we don't need a fast way. Most of the "No" voters would rather have no limit at all and a large amount of the "Yes" would rather have no limit at all.
#3 The people who like to PvP are forced, if not affected/influenced drastically. It's either no PvP at spawn or PvP in the new world.
im of to bed so i will only say one thing.. i dont want to protect the minority i want this limit down and by the best way possible. and fast i growing more and more enoyed with it and dont know how much longer i can take it. this is a compromise only that u dont want it..
youngs your compromise only works with the limit staying up. This is the only compomise that give freedom to those who want it and limited space to tose that want that. Without deviding the player population any more than the nether would. Also i'm sure you're just all talk saying you'd vote against the limt rather than this. I'm not seeing a change recently in the "Boundary is simply removed, nothing else happens" vote. Also mitte is right your long ass post makes little sence.Also if you are afraid more pvp will be at spawn and not in the pvp world you can just keep your old world location at spawn and have 2 stomping grounds for all the noob killing you want. Also what's all this minority shit? You fucks didn't care about the minority when you put up this damn limit. And yes going for this solution souly for the fact we get our freedom back is an excelent reson to support this.
If you want to hold a vote to get rid of the pvp world after the limit is down i will be on your side.
RevStoningpot wrote:youngs your compromise only works with the limit staying up. This is the only compomise that give freedom to those who want it and limited space to tose that want that. Without deviding the player population any more than the nether would. Also i'm sure you're just all talk saying you'd vote against the limt rather than this. I'm not seeing a change recently in the "Boundary is simply removed, nothing else happens" vote. Also mitte is right your long ass post makes little sence.Also if you are afraid more pvp will be at spawn and not in the pvp world you can just keep your old world location at spawn and have 2 stomping grounds for all the noob killing you want. Also what's all this minority shit? You fucks didn't care about the minority when you put up this damn limit. And yes going for this solution souly for the fact we get our freedom back is an excelent reson to support this.
If you want to hold a vote to get rid of the pvp world after the limit is down i will be on your side.
RevStoningpot wrote:youngs your compromise only works with the limit staying up. This is the only compomise that give freedom to those who want it and limited space to tose that want that. Without deviding the player population any more than the nether would. Also i'm sure you're just all talk saying you'd vote against the limt rather than this. I'm not seeing a change recently in the "Boundary is simply removed, nothing else happens" vote. Also mitte is right your long ass post makes little sence.Also if you are afraid more pvp will be at spawn and not in the pvp world you can just keep your old world location at spawn and have 2 stomping grounds for all the noob killing you want. Also what's all this minority shit? You fucks didn't care about the minority when you put up this damn limit. And yes going for this solution souly for the fact we get our freedom back is an excelent reson to support this.
If you want to hold a vote to get rid of the pvp world after the limit is down i will be on your side.
Youngs, quote mining is when you take a portion of what someone says out of context to make it seem as if they said something they didn't. As for the rebuttal, it seems I was wrong (perhaps) on what you were arguing, but to be fair, your post wasn't the most clear. Perhaps I misread it. I'll have a better rebuttal soon.
RevStoningpot wrote:youngs your compromise only works with the limit staying up. This is the only compomise that give freedom to those who want it and limited space to tose that want that. Without deviding the player population any more than the nether would. Also i'm sure you're just all talk saying you'd vote against the limt rather than this. I'm not seeing a change recently in the "Boundary is simply removed, nothing else happens" vote. Also mitte is right your long ass post makes little sence.Also if you are afraid more pvp will be at spawn and not in the pvp world you can just keep your old world location at spawn and have 2 stomping grounds for all the noob killing you want. Also what's all this minority shit? You fucks didn't care about the minority when you put up this damn limit. And yes going for this solution souly for the fact we get our freedom back is an excelent reson to support this.
If you want to hold a vote to get rid of the pvp world after the limit is down i will be on your side.
When did I say more PvP would be at spawn? I'm saying that this isn't a compromise. Once again, my beef with MultiWorld has nothing to do with whether we have the limit or not. That's an excellent reason to support no limit at all, not this.
RevStoningpot wrote:If you want to hold a vote to get rid of the pvp world after the limit is down i will be on your side.
How about we just have a vote for no limit at all vs limit rather than this (cus this isn't a compromise) since apparently Lone, Rev, and foschnizzle don't support the MultiWorld part of this.
i do so my vote is yes and i feel this is an excelent compromise. I originaly proposed the multi world long ago so every one could have their cake and eat it too. You just must not like cake. I'm pretty sure lone and Fo like cake too.
I like some cake. But cake goes well with parties, and a party isn't really a party if it doesn't have all your friends there. I'm not taking sides here, just voicing logic and reason. Or at least trying. And I like cake. But only the legit stuff. No lie.
