Yes, this small factor heavily outweighs the cons of dictatorship.This is why democracy is a fail system. People don't even understand what they're voting on...
Multiworld
Re: Multiworld
-
worldruler086
- hated the previously assigned rank
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:51 am
- Location: Airtseuqe
Re: Multiworld
To be fair, the pros of democracy far outweigh the pros of dictatorship as well.Boxy wrote:Yes, this small factor heavily outweighs the cons of dictatorship.This is why democracy is a fail system. People don't even understand what they're voting on...
Re: Multiworld
to quote a forum philosopher of ours, .. thatsthejoke.jpg
-
Gnatogryz
- hated the previously assigned rank
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 4:36 pm
- Location: Poland
Re: Multiworld
I guess people are voting no, because they think this somehow introduces teleportation or splits the server in half, or even creates "Safe worlds". That's why Rev was right - the votes should be public. Hell - every person should explain why they're voting on something - just to make sure they've actually read the first post.
Btw China isn't doing so bad, even though they don't have democracy ;)
Btw China isn't doing so bad, even though they don't have democracy ;)
-
worldruler086
- hated the previously assigned rank
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:51 am
- Location: Airtseuqe
Re: Multiworld
Even though I already said why I voted, I'll say it again, just to make it clear. I'm voting for this for 3 main reasons. Ending the limit is not one of them. (though it is one of the lesser ones)
1. A compromise both parties (not everyone, but both parties) can agree upon.
2. A pvp event world that would be easily accessable, which will make the game easier for players, and will also be easier on the newer people (the non-spawn rats), so this will INCREASE the number of people who join and stay. Much more then any limit would.
3. This seems like something I could do, and I don't like pvp. I could see myself fighting in arenas for fun, so why is this bad? It seems almost like the olympics, people from far away lands being able to go to one place at one time, without the travel.
1. A compromise both parties (not everyone, but both parties) can agree upon.
2. A pvp event world that would be easily accessable, which will make the game easier for players, and will also be easier on the newer people (the non-spawn rats), so this will INCREASE the number of people who join and stay. Much more then any limit would.
3. This seems like something I could do, and I don't like pvp. I could see myself fighting in arenas for fun, so why is this bad? It seems almost like the olympics, people from far away lands being able to go to one place at one time, without the travel.
-
LoneSoldier55
- Moron
- Posts: 4391
- Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 6:40 pm
- Location: Equestria, Visiting Billy Mays
Re: Multiworld
Are you fucking kidding me Youngs. Now all you seem to be doing is going against what everyone wants.
-
Bloop the poop
- Moron
- Posts: 1537
- Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2011 11:19 pm
- Location: Up your ass and around the corner.
- Contact:
Re: Multiworld
I guess since there's no helping it... i'll go with this multiworld shit. Give it a try... ;)
-
worldruler086
- hated the previously assigned rank
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:51 am
- Location: Airtseuqe
Re: Multiworld
bloop, why are you against this? It seems that those against this misinterpret what is being voted on.
-
FoSchnizzle
- Moron
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:15 am
- Contact:
Re: Multiworld
Didn't he just say he's for it now...?
-
worldruler086
- hated the previously assigned rank
- Posts: 835
- Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2011 1:51 am
- Location: Airtseuqe
Re: Multiworld
reluctantly. I'm wondering why he was against it in the first place.